← Search

Cheyenne Harward

Richardson, TX
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
29 matches · 10W–19L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Cheyenne Harward to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history29 matches
L
2026-06-13 · Canyon Creek/Gooch W3.5S · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-11 · Canyon Creek/Gooch W3.5T · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-02 · Canyon Creek/Gooch W3.5T · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-31 · Canyon Creek/Gooch W3.5S · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · Canyon Creek/Gooch W3.5S · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-09 · Canyon Creek/Gooch W3.5S · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-05-08 · Canyon Creek/Gooch W3.5T · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-07 · Canyon Creek/Gooch W3.5T · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
Laura Evans
2025-10-19 · Canyon Creek/Abernethy W3.0S · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-10-17 · Fretz/Lyons W3.0F · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tori Kimmel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2025-10-12 · Canyon Creek/Abernethy W3.0S · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
Holly Moore
2025-10-10 · Fretz/Lyons W3.0F · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 59.4% of games
3.0
25%
2W–6L · 44.5% of games
3.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 43.4% of games
6.0mixed
0%
0W–6L · 25.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 31% of the time
#1 Singles
31%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
6 matches
#2 Singles
21%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer