← Search

Edward Houstman

Bentonville, AR
3.0S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
21 matches · 15W–6L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Edward Houstman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history21 matches
W
2026-09-03 · Patterson/Bentonville/MRC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Drew Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-08-12 · Smith-Cockrell/Rogers/MRC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matthew Gross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-06 · Smith-Cockrell/Rogers/MRC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Grant Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-16 · Gross/Lowell/MRC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Roden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
Lorena Serrese Warn / John Miller
2026-07-14 · Gross/Lowell/MRC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maya Kushmaul mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-10 · Gross/Lowell/MRC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maya Kushmaul mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-08 · Smith-Cockrell/Rogers/MRC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andy Stoner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-25 · Smith-Cockrell/Rogers/MRC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brandon Morrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-20 · Smith-Cockrell/Rogers/MRC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matthew Hanafin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-10 · Smith-Cockrell/Rogers/MRC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mudit Agrawal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · Patterson/Bentonville/MRC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Grant Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-01 · Patterson/Bentonville/MRC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Grant Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
76.9%
10W–3L · 57.8% of games
5.5
50%
2W–2L · 51.5% of games
6.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
5 matches
#3 Singles
14%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
2 matches
#2 Singles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert