← Search

Amber Keough

Lexington, SC
3.5S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
25 matches · 15W–10L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Amber Keough to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history25 matches
W
2026-09-10 · LATA18/BURTON/LCTC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kaliska Vazquez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
Jordan Slagle / Kelsey Hartvigsen
2026-09-01 · CTL18/Bonilla/CTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Marie Aimone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-27 · CTL18/Bonilla/CTFC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Hannah Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
Shannon Peterson / Elizabeth King
2026-08-20 · CTL18/Bonilla/CTFC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Hannah Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-11 · CTL18/Bonilla/CTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Marie Aimone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-04 · CTL18/Bonilla/CTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jackeline Bonilla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-30 · CTL18/Bonilla/CTFC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Hannah Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-28 · CTL18/Bonilla/CTC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Marie Aimone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-21 · CTL18/Bonilla/CTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Paige McKeown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-08 · LATA18/Burton/LCTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Rudzinski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-10 · LATA18/Burton/LCTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Keough mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-06-03 · LATA18/Burton/LCTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Keough mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 63.3% of games
6.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 56.3% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 46.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
14 matches
#1 Singles
20%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe