← Search

Pam Abernathy

— year-end
35 matches · 20W–15L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Pam Abernathy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history35 matches
L
Julia Johnson / Abby Ayson
2026-09-01 · Locke/Calhoun on Tuesdays · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Monica Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-18 · Locke/Calhoun on Tuesdays · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Amy Hodges
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-28 · Locke/Calhoun on Tuesdays · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lori Patch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-06-16 · Chapman · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Connie Quinn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-18 · Angland/Hamilton · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Catrina Mashburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-04 · Angland/Hamilton · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pam Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-04-20 · Angland/Hamilton · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Catrina Mashburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-04-01 · Mashburn · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dina Greeson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-03-30 · Locke/Calhoun · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nina Fortenberry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-03-28 · Mashburn · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kay Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-03-23 · Mashburn · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Crissy Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-19 · Chapman · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Mobbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Teams19 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 61% of games
3.0
30.8%
4W–9L · 43.3% of games
3.5
20%
1W–4L · 49.1% of games
5.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 63.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams