← Search

Denise Wheeler

Prairie Village, KS
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
16 matches · 13W–3L · seasons 2026–2026

Captains: add Denise Wheeler to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history16 matches
W
2026-06-18 · Petersen,Rachel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kara Cowie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
Kathleen Savaiano / Emily Tippin
2026-06-18 · Petersen,Rachel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kara Cowie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-06-17 · Petersen,Rachel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rachel Petersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-04 · Petersen,Rachel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Liz Meitl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-21 · Petersen,Rachel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kara Cowie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-15 · Petersen,Rachel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Liz Meitl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-23 · Petersen,Rachel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rachel Petersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-16 · Petersen,Rachel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Liz Meitl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-03-29 · Petersen, Rachel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Liz Meitl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-02-22 · Petersen, Rachel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rachel Denton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-01-18 · Petersen, Rachel · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rachel Petersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-01-04 · Petersen, Rachel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bethany Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2026–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.0
81.2%
13W–3L · 58.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 94% of the time
#1 Doubles
94%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova