← Search

Greg Dinardo

Richmond, VA
3.0D year-end 2026
i
Disqualification — a rule enforcement, not a computed rating
28 matches · 20W–8L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Greg Dinardo to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history28 matches
W
2026-09-07 · Willow Oaks Franks · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Diego Baltodano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-15 · Willow Oaks Franks · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Thomas Robertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-02 · Willow Oaks Franks · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kevin White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-07 · Willow Oaks Franks · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-31 · Willow Oaks Franks · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jim Kennedy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-17 · Willow Oaks Franks · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-26 · Willow Oaks Robertson · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Thomas Robertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-04-26 · Willow Oaks Franks · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-25 · Willow Oaks Robertson · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-12 · Willow Oaks Franks · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-04-04 · Willow Oaks Robertson · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-04 · Willow Oaks Franks · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 63.8% of games
3.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 50.5% of games
5.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 52.2% of games
2.5mixed
100%
5W–0L · 65.1% of games
5.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 45.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
8 matches
#1 Singles
21%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
3 matches
#2 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer