← Search

Margo Garcelon

— year-end
14 matches · 5W–9L · seasons 2026–2026

Captains: add Margo Garcelon to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history14 matches
L
2026-06-05 · Waterford Lakes-Driggers · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-29 · Waterford Lakes-Driggers · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-22 · Waterford Lakes-Driggers · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-15 · Waterford Lakes-Driggers · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-01 · Waterford Lakes-Driggers · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-24 · Waterford Lakes-Driggers · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-22 · Waterford Lakes-Driggers · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-04-03 · Waterford Lakes-Driggers · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-27 · Waterford Lakes-Driggers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Sipio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-06 · Waterford-Driggers Slice Girls · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-27 · Waterford-Driggers Slice Girls · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-20 · Waterford-Driggers Slice Girls · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Teams3 teams · 2026–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
35.7%
5W–9L · 43.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 64% of the time
#1 Singles
64%
9 matches
#2 Singles
29%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer