← Search

Michelle Nealy

— year-end
27 matches · 12W–15L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Michelle Nealy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history27 matches
L
2026-08-29 · Varble/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Emily Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-15 · Varble/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Rachel Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-07-25 · Varble/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Allison Varble
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-27 · Varble/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Rita Spellings
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-13 · Varble/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Rita Spellings
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-04 · Claiborne/Nealy/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Rita Spellings
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-04-27 · Hamrick/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rita Spellings
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-21 · Claiborne/Nealy/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Rita Spellings
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
Lauren Hamby
2026-04-14 · Claiborne/Nealy/Nashville · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-04-06 · Hamrick/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Claiborne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-30 · Hamrick/Nashville · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-24 · Claiborne/Nealy/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Rita Spellings
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Teams6 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 73.4% of games
3.0
20%
2W–8L · 27.4% of games
5.5
25%
2W–6L · 35.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
6 matches
#1 Singles
7%
2 matches
#2 Singles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal