← Search

Sydney Flaig

— year-end
30 matches · 19W–11L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Sydney Flaig to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history30 matches
L
2026-09-03 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Melissa Campana
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Holly Roblee / Nastassja Riley
2026-08-29 · Houstman/Bentonville/KTC · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Annemarie Porter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
Cheryl Williams / Elizabeth Mitchell
2026-08-15 · Wallace/Bella Vista/KTC · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Elizabeth Wallace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-20 · Wallace/Bella Vista/KTC · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Elizabeth Wallace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-16 · Mitchell/Bentonville/KTC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jc Mitchell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-09 · Mitchell/Bentonville/KTC · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jc Mitchell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-06-04 · Wallace/Bella Vista/KTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-01 · Pigo/Bentonville · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-29 · Houstman/Bentonville/KTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natalie Houstman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-04-27 · Houstman/Bentonville/KTC · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · Webster/Bentonville/KTC · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sarah Pigo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-14 · Webster/Bentonville/KTC · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Teams9 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
100%
5W–0L · 87% of games
3.0
58.8%
10W–7L · 59.9% of games
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
50%
2W–2L · 54.8% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 23% of the time
#2 Doubles
23%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
6 matches
#1 Singles
20%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
6 matches
#2 Singles
10%
3 matches
#3 Singles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams