← Search

Rebecca Miller

Atlanta, GA
3.0S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
72 matches · 51W–21L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Rebecca Miller to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history72 matches
W
2026-04-24 · Piedmont Park (Lauren Price)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Keith Pickering mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-27 · Piedmont Park (Patrick Daggs)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alex Kuo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-03-20 · Piedmont Park (Lauren Price)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alex Kuo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-03-19 · Piedmont Park (Lauren Price)* · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Josh Hollis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-01-24 · #3 Doubles · with Megan Krauth championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 7-6
W
2026-01-17 · Piedmont Park (Sarah Kim)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-01-15 · Piedmont Park (Sarah Kim)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Taylor Drouault
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-11-22 · Piedmont Park (Sarah Kim)* · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-11-15 · Piedmont Park (Sarah Kim)* · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqueline Burleson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
N/A
2025-11-08 · Piedmont Park (Sarah Kim)* · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqueline Burleson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-10-10 · Piedmont Park (Lauren Price)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Miller - * mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
Rebecca Miller - * / Julio Guzman
2025-10-03 · Piedmont Park (Lauren Price)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christopher Mills mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
100%
5W–0L · 81.3% of games
4.5
71.2%
42W–17L · 55.8% of games
3.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 55.7% of games
3.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 58% of the time
#2 Doubles
58%
42 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
11 matches
#2 Singles
8%
6 matches
#1 Singles
7%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King