← Search

Rebekah Springer

— year-end
12 matches · 6W–6L · seasons 2026–2026

Captains: add Rebekah Springer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history12 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Schwab/18s/5.5/SC · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Megan Bucy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-05 · Roy/18s/3.5-2.5/SC · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jenni Abrams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-11 · Smith/18s/3.0/SC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Peyton Vitellaro mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-24 · Roy/18s/3.5-2.5/SC · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Hope Riccobono
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-17 · Roy/18s/3.5-2.5/SC · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jenni Abrams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-05-30 · Smith/18s/3.0/SC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jake Springer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-20 · Roy/18s/3.5-2.5/SC · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sam Yelnick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-05 · Guillet/18's/3.0/COQ Night · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rachel Schulingkamp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-28 · Guillet/18's/3.0/COQ Night · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-21 · Guillet/18's/3.0/COQ Night · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-14 · Guillet/18's/3.0/COQ Night · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kacie Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
Jessica Haley / Susan Nelson
2026-03-10 · Guillet/18's/3.0/COQ Night · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cecilia Hanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
Teams4 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 65.8% of games
3.0
20%
1W–4L · 38.6% of games
5.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
2 matches
#2 Singles
17%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer