← Search

Wes Price

— year-end
12 matches · 6W–6L · seasons 2026–2026

Captains: add Wes Price to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history12 matches
W
2026-09-01 · Varner, Chris · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Winston Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-08-25 · Varner, Chris · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Julio Morales
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-08-12 · Smith, Nathan · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Edward Resch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-04 · Varner, Chris · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Julio Morales
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
John Jeffreys / David Mason
2026-06-22 · Williamson, Greg · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tyler Lantz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-1
W
Blair Williamson / David Mason
2026-05-11 · Williamson, Greg · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chris Varner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-05-04 · Williamson, Greg · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristopher Hamel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
Abram Diaz / James Johnson
2026-04-14 · Smith, Nathan · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wesley Self
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-26 · Smith, Nathan · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Barnard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-26 · Smith, Nathan · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
Baley Reed / David Mason
2026-02-19 · Smith, Nathan · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Barnard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-02-12 · Smith, Nathan · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
Teams4 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
50%
4W–4L · 43.9% of games
5.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
4 matches
#1 Singles
8%
1 match
#2 Doubles
8%
1 match
#2 Singles
8%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova