← Search

Robert Barden

— year-end
24 matches · 11W–13L · seasons 2026–2026

Captains: add Robert Barden to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history24 matches
L
2026-09-07 · PBlandford (Mountainbrook) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sam Skaff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-31 · PBlandford (Mountainbrook) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Patrick Kartes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-03 · PBlandford (Mountainbrook) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mike Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-29 · PKartes/Maddle (Mountainbrook) · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Patrick Blandford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-14 · SBarden (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Barden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-07-08 · PKartes/Maddle (Mountainbrook) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tai Kam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-06 · DBarden (Mountainbrook) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-01 · PKartes/Maddle (Mountainbrook) · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jared Kleber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-06-29 · DBarden (Mountainbrook) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-22 · PKartes/Maddle (Mountainbrook) · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Tai Kam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-16 · SBarden (Park Road) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Barden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-08 · DBarden (Mountainbrook) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
Teams6 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
50%
2W–2L · 48.6% of games
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
50%
6W–6L · 51.9% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 52.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
6 matches
#2 Singles
17%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert