← Search

Jeff Hwang

Plymouth, MN
3.0S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
23 matches · 17W–6L · seasons 2026–2026

Captains: add Jeff Hwang to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history23 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Hahler: Backhand Compliments · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marcus Hahler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-02 · Hahler: Backhand Compliments · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rafael Feijo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-08-19 · Hahler: Backhand Compliments · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marcus Hahler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-12 · Hahler: Backhand Compliments · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rafael Feijo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-16 · Turnblad: Volley Llamas · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marcus Hahler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-12 · Li: Sunday Servers · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Clara Choe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4
W
2026-07-09 · Turnblad: Volley Llamas · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Drew Turnblad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-07-02 · Turnblad: Volley Llamas · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Travis Crow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-28 · Li: Sunday Servers · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Clara Choe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-25 · Turnblad: Volley Llamas · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Drew Turnblad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-18 · Turnblad: Volley Llamas · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Josh Kasendorf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-07 · Li: Sunday Servers · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Clara Choe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2026–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
82.4%
14W–3L · 59.9% of games
6.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 42.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova