← Search

Erin Asgedom

Elmhurst, IL
3.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
18 matches · 16W–2L · seasons 2026–2026

Captains: add Erin Asgedom to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history18 matches
L
Katelyn Marciniak
2026-08-15 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
Anne Streeper
2026-08-15 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
Kelli Radke
2026-08-14 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
Amy Armstrong
2026-08-08 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-06 · NITA S TLW35a Courts Plus-Barsotti/Witt · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sabreen Madden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-30 · NITA S 70MX18a River Forest-Hood · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ronald Kleinschmidt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-2
W
2026-07-09 · NITA S 30W18b Oakbrook Bath-Michalak/Klosterman · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
N/A
2026-06-25 · NITA S 30W18b Oakbrook Bath-Michalak/Klosterman · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meghan Hood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-20 · NITA S TLW35a Courts Plus-Barsotti/Witt · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gina Minick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-03 · NITA S 30W18b Oakbrook Bath-Michalak/Klosterman · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-4
L
2026-05-31 · NITA S 30W18b Oakbrook Bath-Michalak/Klosterman · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2026–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
90%
9W–1L · 66.9% of games
5.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 39% of the time
#1 Singles
39%
7 matches
#2 Singles
28%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
2 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer