← Search

Kathleen Punger

— year-end
19 matches · 6W–13L · seasons 2026–2026

Captains: add Kathleen Punger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history19 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Yadkin/Kim/18+6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Regan Maguire
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-09-01 · Yadkin/Kim/18+6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Meghan Webb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-31 · Yadkin/Boone-Tanner/40+5.5 · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Olivia Gilbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-26 · Yadkin/Talbott/40+3.5 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-19 · Yadkin/Kim/18+6.5 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Allie Wagner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-18 · Yadkin/Kim/18+6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Arianna Armin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-10 · Yadkin/Boone-Tanner/40+5.5 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Sarah Lycan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-09 · Yadkin/Talbott/40+3.5 · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-01 · Yadkin/Boone-Tanner/18+3.5.3.0.2.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-26 · Yadkin/Boone-Tanner/18+3.5.3.0.2.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Tanner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · Yadkin/Boone-Tanner/18+3.5.3.0.2.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nadia Clevenger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-09 · Yadkin/Talbott/40+3.5 · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Teams6 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 51.4% of games
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 34.7% of games
5.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
25%
1W–3L · 40.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
2 matches
#3 Singles
11%
2 matches
#1 Singles
5%
1 match
#2 Singles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova