← Search

Grace Rafield

Birmingham, AL
3.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
12 matches · 11W–1L · seasons 2026–2026

Captains: add Grace Rafield to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history12 matches
W
2026-08-30 · CCB - Hardison · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lauren Tovar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-20 · CCB - Lassiter/Puckett · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Samuels
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-13 · CCB - Lassiter/Puckett · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katie Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-10 · CCB - Hardison · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anne Herfurth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-03 · CCB - Hardison · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Hanna LePere
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-23 · CCB - Lassiter/Puckett · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katie Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-20 · CCB - Hardison · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Alison Lassiter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-06-24 · CCB - Alexander/Hugghins · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eve Toomey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-05-01 · CCB - Lassiter/Puckett · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-10 · CCB - Lassiter/Puckett · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-03-20 · CCB - Lassiter/Puckett · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-03-10 · CCB - Hardison · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2026–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
100%
4W–0L · 77.8% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
100%
7W–0L · 68.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 58% of the time
#1 Doubles
58%
7 matches
#1 Singles
33%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
8%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams