← Search

Claire Williams

Aiken, SC
2.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
34 matches · 9W–25L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Claire Williams to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history34 matches
W
2026-08-31 · Woodside/Burns · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-07-16 · AATL/Woodside · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Mercedes Kucyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-22 · Woodside 2.5 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Anna Macdonald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-04 · Woodside 2.5 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Anna Macdonald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
Amanda Kaminski / Roxanne Still
2026-05-28 · Woodside 2.5 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sarah Rustin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2021-12-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Goldfarb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2021-12-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauralee Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2021-12-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Goldfarb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2021-11-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Habig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
Toni Vanautreve / Louise Meletios
2021-11-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Goldfarb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2021-10-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqueline Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2021-02-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Goldfarb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2026–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
20.7%
6W–23L · 35.9% of games
5.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
8 matches
#2 Singles
6%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert