← Search

Linda Bieber

— year-end
15 matches · 6W–9L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Linda Bieber to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history15 matches
W
2025-06-26 · GB:CourtSavvy:Billipp:Lovejoy · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Surprenant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-3, 1-0
W
2025-06-12 · GB:CourtSavvy:Billipp:Lovejoy · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna Stevens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-05-22 · GB:CourtSavvy:Billipp:Lovejoy · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna Stevens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2025-05-15 · GB:CourtSavvy:Billipp:Lovejoy · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tannye Wold
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-04-24 · GB:CourtSavvy:Billipp:Lovejoy · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ruth Gray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
Kathleen Henry / Kimberly Robinson
2020-03-12 · SC:Gray:Godin · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alison Robie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2019-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sarah Murphy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
Sheilah McGovern / Karen Rydeen
2019-04-04 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sarah Murphy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2019-03-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Coite
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
Nancy Anderson / Andrea Parsons
2019-03-21 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lori Sanderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2019-03-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Murphy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2019-02-21 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alison Robie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Teams2 teams · 2020–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
50%
2W–2L · 51.9% of games
7.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 47.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 60% of the time
#2 Doubles
60%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova