← Search

Nicholas Lamis

Miami, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
188 matches · 53W–135L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nicholas Lamis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history188 matches
L
2026-08-25 · TTA 6.0 Mix · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ibiza Delany mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-08-19 · TTA 6.0 Mix · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ibiza Delany mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-08 · TTA 6.0 Mix · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ibiza Delany mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-25 · TTA 6.0 Mix · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ibiza Delany mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-07-18 · TTA 6.0 Mix · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ibiza Delany mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-28 · TTA 6.0 Mix · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nicole Delgado mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-20 · TTA 6.0 Mix · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Andrea Tice mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-13 · TTA 6.0 Mix · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Laura Curi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-04-15 · Reefer Madness (Coral Reef) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Edgardo Devariel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-14 · Reefer Madness (Coral Reef) · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-02 · Lamis (Coral Reef) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Solares
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-31 · Reefer Madness (Coral Reef) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karl Cetta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
13.3%
4W–26L · 37% of games
3.5
27.6%
27W–71L · 40% of games
7.0
40.7%
11W–16L · 47.2% of games
7.5
12.5%
2W–14L · 39.7% of games
6.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 46.6% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 55.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 52% of the time
#3 Doubles
52%
97 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
44 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams