← Search

Cindy Lavender

Columbia, SC
3.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
21 matches · 8W–13L · seasons 2021–2023

Captains: add Cindy Lavender to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history21 matches
W
2023-03-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debra Krotish
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2023-03-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debra Krotish
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
W
2023-03-20 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Libba Shrader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2023-03-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gail Harrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2023-03-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joan Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2023-02-20 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Lough
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2023-02-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Pool
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2022-09-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Judy Rockwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2022-09-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Libba Shrader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2022-08-26 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nan Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2022-08-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nan Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2022-04-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Stebbins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
42.1%
8W–11L · 44.6% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe