← Search

Tom van Denover

Centennial, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
128 matches · 83W–45L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tom van Denover to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history128 matches
W
2026-07-28 · LTFC YELLOW · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Samuelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-21 · LTFC YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Scott Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-12 · #3 Doubles · with Scott Collins championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
Bret Holcomb / Michael Baker
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · with Thomas Samuelson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-08 · LTFC BLUE · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-06-30 · LTFC YELLOW · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Waring
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-06-23 · LTFC YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Samuelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-17 · LTFC BLUE · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-12 · LTFC GOLD · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matt Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-05 · LTFC GOLD · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Scott Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-03 · LTFC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Samuelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-05-29 · LTFC GOLD · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paul Robbertz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
72.7%
24W–9L · 60.7% of games
4.5
20%
1W–4L · 37.4% of games
8.0
82.1%
32W–7L · 64.5% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
37 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
34 matches
#1 Singles
9%
12 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams