← Search

Jeffrey Bowser

Oklahoma City, OK
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
187 matches · 110W–77L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jeffrey Bowser to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history187 matches
L
2026-06-19 · No Fault · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Canaan Gardner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-17 · No Fault · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Corey Doyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-12 · No Fault · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Khiem Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-10 · No Fault · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gary Broxterman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-07 · LANE 55+ · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gary Broxterman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-29 · No Fault · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Neumeister
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-26 · LANE 55+ · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ken Ellinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-21 · No Fault · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Carlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-05-15 · LANE 55+ · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gary Broxterman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-04-28 · LANE 55+ · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Peters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-22 · No Fault · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joel Lissy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-04-08 · No Fault · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gary Broxterman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.0
65.5%
72W–38L · 56.6% of games
4.5
40%
8W–12L · 41% of games
8.0
55.6%
30W–24L · 53.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
66 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
61 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
53 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
5 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert