← Search

Amie Villarini

CRANBURY, NJ
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
27 matches · 18W–9L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Amie Villarini to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history27 matches
W
2026-06-06 · Pancha · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Carolina Lobel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-30 · Pancha · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Jill Pancha
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2025-03-27 · The Determinators · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Catherine Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-03-20 · The Determinators · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Catherine Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-03-06 · The Determinators · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Carol Hammond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2024-10-12 · NJD/DeBarbadillo · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Jill Pancha
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2024-09-08 · NJD/DeBarbadillo · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Elena DeBarbadillo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2024-06-20 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Jill Pancha
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-6
W
2024-06-13 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Elena DeBarbadillo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-0
W
2024-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Elena DeBarbadillo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2024-04-28 · EBRC · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Jill Pancha
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
2024-03-14 · EBRC · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Amy Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.0
57.1%
8W–6L · 54.1% of games
8.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 80% of games
9.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 56% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 63% of the time
#1 Doubles
63%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams