← Search

Chris Christensen

Meridian, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
130 matches · 61W–69L · seasons 2015–2026

Captains: add Chris Christensen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history130 matches
L
2026-08-25 · Strung Out 8.5 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Clarissa Cutler-Evans mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-29 · Shank'd It 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Justin Endow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-15 · Shank'd It 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacob Sessions
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-08 · Shank'd It 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brent Larkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
Tim Trued - (DQ)* / Bryan Escobedo
2026-06-01 · Shank'd It 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacob Sessions
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-18 · Shank'd It 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joshua Cramer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-04-29 · Racqueteers 40s · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Roman Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-04-20 · Racqueteers 40s · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jeremy Cramer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-15 · Racqueteers 40s · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tim Trued
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-01 · Racqueteers 40s · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tim Trued
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Justin Endow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-29 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeremy Canning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
25%
2W–6L · 47.7% of games
4.5
67.9%
38W–18L · 54.5% of games
8.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 51% of games
8.5mixed
37%
10W–17L · 44.6% of games
9.0mixed
22.7%
5W–17L · 39.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
25 matches
#2 Singles
5%
6 matches
#1 Singles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova