← Search

John Perry

HIGH POINT, NC
0.0 year-end
29 matches · 9W–20L · seasons 2016–2021

Captains: add John Perry to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history29 matches
W
James Griffith / Craig Callahan
2021-05-05 · Hitchcock · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bill Hitchcock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
Kevin Hulse / Steve Hestenes
2021-04-28 · Hitchcock · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bill Hitchcock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
Eric Sizemore / Eric Carwile
2021-04-07 · Hitchcock · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Nolan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
James Lachance
2020-09-09 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7
W
Brian Evans
2019-06-17 · #3 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
Daniel Avampato
2019-06-10 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Michael Xu
2019-06-04 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
Corey Davis / Jeremy Madrazo
2019-05-15 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Amato
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
Myron Herron / Reaves King
2019-05-01 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bill Hitchcock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
Kenneth Kreidler / Bill Schermerhorn
2019-04-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anthony Saenz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
Charles Mcmasters / Doug Hurley
2019-04-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charles Bolton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
Brian Smith / Jens Bursche
2019-04-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anthony Saenz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
36.4%
8W–14L · 45.8% of games
8.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 37.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
6 matches
#2 Singles
10%
3 matches
#3 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova