← Search

Gene Lonardo

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
132 matches · 80W–52L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Gene Lonardo to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history132 matches
W
2026-06-06 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-30 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-04-18 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-11 · RED ROCK CC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Hopson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-10 · DTC #2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charles Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-03-28 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-03-21 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-03-20 · DTC #2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alvin Sabas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-03-14 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W
William Feast / Michael Miller
2026-03-13 · DTC #2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alvin Sabas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-02-28 · DTC #1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Craig Slayter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-02-27 · NV/Sabillo/65&Over7.0M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephen Newell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
90.9%
10W–1L · 67.5% of games
3.5
60.4%
58W–38L · 54.4% of games
4.0
33.3%
5W–10L · 43.9% of games
7.0
100%
6W–0L · 72.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 42% of the time
#1 Singles
42%
55 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
9%
12 matches
#1 Male Doubles
8%
11 matches
#1 Male Singles
8%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer