← Search

Page Ream

— year-end
117 matches · 79W–38L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Page Ream to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history117 matches
W
2026-09-02 · LATA/REAM/CAMP · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Theresa Stader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-30 · LATA/REAM/CAMP · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sandy Shannon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-29 · CTL55/Simpson/CTFC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kathleen Lenti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-22 · LATA 55/Graczyk/CAMP · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Louise Burpee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-16 · LATA 55/Graczyk/CAMP · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anne Blackmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-08-15 · CTL55/Simpson/CTFC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kathy Foster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-13 · CTL40/Lyons/CTFC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carol Alan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-06 · CTL40/Lyons/CTFC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stacy Lyons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-08-05 · CTL65/HORNE/CTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lynne Mizzell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-30 · CTL40/Lyons/CTFC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Theresa Stader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-29 · CTL65/HORNE/CTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lynne Mizzell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-23 · CTL40/Lyons/CTFC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Echols
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
Teams73 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
82.7%
43W–9L · 61.1% of games
4.0
47.6%
10W–11L · 47.6% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
66.7%
24W–12L · 55.5% of games
3.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 45% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
26 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer