← Search

Maggie Hartman

— year-end
91 matches · 25W–66L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Maggie Hartman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history91 matches
L
Michelle Jones / Cathy Johnson
2026-09-01 · Kennamer 55 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julia Godfrey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-29 · Hartman/Paulson · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katie Hartman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-23 · Hartman/Paulson · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katie Hartman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-15 · Kennamer 55 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Greer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-13 · Creager 7.5 40+ DAY 2026 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Maggie Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-11 · Hartman/Paulson · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jessica Hartman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-10 · Kennamer 40 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Greer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
Laura Smith / Judy Wiles
2026-08-10 · Creager 7.5 40+ DAY 2026 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan DuPre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-08 · Hartman/Paulson · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katie Hartman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-04 · Kennamer 40 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tenise Spry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-03 · Creager 7.5 40+ DAY 2026 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tenise Spry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-30 · Kennamer 40 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tenise Spry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Teams43 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
32.6%
15W–31L · 43.3% of games
4.0
7.7%
1W–12L · 32.7% of games
6.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 45.7% of games
7.5
29.4%
5W–12L · 37.3% of games
3.5mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 49.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
24 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams