← Search

Irma Laney

Catawba, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
232 matches · 156W–76L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Irma Laney to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history232 matches
W
2026-09-08 · DWest (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lorna Doucette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-09-01 · DWest (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Megan Griffin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-25 · DWest (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Janna Huggins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-24 · CWincek/WParker (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 9.5 · with Jessica Mauney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-19 · DWest (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Hoa Tran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-1
L
2026-08-18 · DWest (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Austin Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-08-15 · DWest (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Dora Burdzinska-Drezek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-08-05 · DWest (Park Road) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Dora Burdzinska-Drezek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-27 · MLKDA-Davis/Edgemoor · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joe Wolff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-22 · DWest/CWincek (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with MAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · with Toni Laney championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Jenny Webster / Kathy Lee
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · with Toni Laney championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams78 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
100%
5W–0L · 61.2% of games
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
70.8%
17W–7L · 60% of games
4.5
71.2%
47W–19L · 58.6% of games
7.5
64.3%
9W–5L · 58% of games
8.5
66.7%
26W–13L · 56.1% of games
9.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
54.5%
12W–10L · 49.5% of games
8.0mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 56.1% of games
9.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
76 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
70 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
60 matches
#1 Singles
7%
15 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches
#3 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert