← Search

Dana Seblonka

Mount Pleasant, SC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
60 matches · 18W–42L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Dana Seblonka to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history60 matches
L
2026-07-15 · LCTA40/Winch-Hoffman/Brickyard · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Julie Cole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-07-08 · LCTA40/Winch-Hoffman/Brickyard · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Mandy Kramer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2025-11-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimber Wiggins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim ONeill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-11-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimber Wiggins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2025-10-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Heffling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-10-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimber Wiggins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-10-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimber Wiggins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-10-16 · LCTA18/HOFFMAN/BRICKYARD · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Minhthu Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gina Jamison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
Nell Hinchey / Stephanie Davis
2025-10-09 · LCTA18/HOFFMAN/BRICKYARD · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Gerald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2025-10-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimber Wiggins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
30%
12W–28L · 40.8% of games
5.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
41.7%
5W–7L · 47.7% of games
3.5mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 38.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
14 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova