Paula Schwartz
146 matches · 81W–65L · seasons 2019–2024
Captains: add Paula Schwartz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history146 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
Teams20 teams · 2021–2024
NNM 4.0W HP - Emmons
NNM 8.0W Beavis-HP
4.0W HP-Emmons
NNM 4.0W HP - Emmons
NNM 8.0 ELG - Miller
NNM 8.0 TCA - Goradia
NNM 8.0W JC - Letz
NNM 4.0W HP - Swanson
NNM 4.0W Lobo Club - Brunacini-Jones
NNM 4.5W HP - Hollowell
NNM 8.0MX JC - Rising
NNM 8.0W HP - Schwartz
NNM TriW JC - Towery
NNM/Rising/55& Over Mixed/8.0
NNM 4.0W HP - Emmons
NNM 4.0W HP - Jones
NNM 4.5W HP - Hollowell
NNM 4.5W HP - Hollowell
NNM 8.0W HP - Brown
NNM TriW JC - Towery
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
71%
49W–20L · 57.9% of games
4.5
21.9%
7W–25L · 40.6% of games
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
60%
15W–10L · 54.7% of games
8.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 51.6% of games
9.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 47.7% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
80 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
13 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.