← Search

Pamela Kane

— year-end
106 matches · 67W–39L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Pamela Kane to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history106 matches
L
2026-07-27 · Indy A55 8.0W IRCD Gupta · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ruth Grissom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-22 · Indy A40 4.5W IRCD Thompson · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julia Clay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-20 · Indy A55 8.0W IRCD Gupta · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Schneider
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-15 · Indy A40 4.5W IRCD Thompson · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ruth Grissom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-13 · Indy A55 8.0W IRCD Gupta · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marylu Kosiarek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
Karen Fennerty / Roberta Norwood
2026-05-31 · Indy A55 8.0W IRCD Gupta · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with DEBORAH HAMEL
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-10-25 · CIN C 8.5W IRCD Thompson · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Galina Blomenkamp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-09-21 · CIN C 7.5W IRCD Pruitt · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jill Chlystun
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-08-18 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Brabender
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-07-26 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ruth Grissom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
Julie Jones / Kelly Sharpe
2025-07-24 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Mortier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2025-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ruth Grissom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Teams9 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
73.3%
33W–12L · 60.4% of games
4.5
17.6%
3W–14L · 35.7% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
85.2%
23W–4L · 62.7% of games
8.5
60%
6W–4L · 44.8% of games
9.0
0%
0W–4L · 37.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
17 matches
#1 Singles
7%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer