Paula Deemer
151 matches · 63W–88L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Paula Deemer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history151 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Teams14 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
52.8%
38W–34L · 51.4% of games
4.0
27.9%
12W–31L · 40.9% of games
7.0
58.3%
7W–5L · 47% of games
7.5
33.3%
6W–12L · 41.7% of games
8.0
0%
0W–5L · 26.5% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 60% of the time
#1 Doubles
60%
91 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
11 matches
#1 Singles
3%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.