← Search

Kristin Gibson

— year-end
87 matches · 48W–39L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kristin Gibson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history87 matches
W
2026-09-04 · SD HT La Jolla B&TC/ Scher · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tiffany Kellogg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-08-29 · SD 9.0 Surf and Turf/ Martinez · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Stuart Ridge mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-08-28 · SD HT La Jolla B&TC/ Scher · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tiffany Kellogg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-08-25 · SDNC Super HT Miramar College/ Alva · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with ERIN HUGHES
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-21 · SD HT La Jolla B&TC/ Scher · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tiffany Kellogg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-18 · SDNC Super HT Miramar College/ Alva · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tiffany Kellogg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-15 · SD 9.0 Surf and Turf/ Martinez · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Stuart Ridge mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-11 · SDNC Super HT Miramar College/ Alva · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mary Malhame
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-10 · SD 9.0 Surf and Turf/ Martinez · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jonathan Coyle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-08-09 · #3 Doubles · with Madalyn Moore championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
Kelly Kenney / Madison Ashton
2026-08-09 · #1 Doubles · with ERIN HUGHES championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with ERIN HUGHES championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Teams25 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.5
84%
21W–4L · 62.1% of games
5.0
34.8%
8W–15L · 46.5% of games
9.0
100%
4W–0L · 57.1% of games
10.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
42.1%
8W–11L · 50.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
36 matches
#1 Doubles
38%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
12 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Female Doubles
2%
2 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer