← Search

Greg Fossen

Thornton, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
174 matches · 65W–109L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Greg Fossen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history174 matches
W
Brian Knaley / Adrian Clarke
2026-08-17 · TTA ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeffrey McNally
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-10 · TTA ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paul Swanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-15 · LTA-Q GREEN · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Roy Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · LTA-Q GREEN · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Lax
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-01 · LTA-Q GREEN · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Lax
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
N/A
2026-06-29 · TTA GREEN · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-22 · TTA GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Moises Ramos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-15 · TTA GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with William Hoxworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-03 · TTA BLACK · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeffrey Chartier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-06-01 · TTA GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jay Bat-Itgel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-27 · TTA BLACK · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rodney Gill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-13 · TTA BLACK · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Daley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
39.4%
39W–60L · 48.1% of games
6.0
53.8%
7W–6L · 47.2% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
35.6%
16W–29L · 48.8% of games
6.5mixed
20%
3W–12L · 44.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
37 matches
#1 Singles
14%
24 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert