← Search

Linda Burks-Adams

Mint Hill, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
109 matches · 41W–68L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Linda Burks-Adams to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history109 matches
L
2026-07-20 · JRankin (Life Time) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rory Mcnicholas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-06 · JRankin (Life Time) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bill Pleasants mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-14 · JRankin (Life Time) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cary Chaney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-05-18 · JRankin (Life Time) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicolas Savelieff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-09 · CKing/JMu (Life Time) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joyce Mu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-04-14 · JMu (Park Road) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Martha Nazemi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-04-04 · JMu/LConover (Mason Wallace) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jan Albright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-04-02 · JMu (Park Road) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Martha Nazemi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-03-31 · KIrwin (Life Time) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Cooke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-03-29 · JMu (Park Road) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary McGarvey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-03-28 · JMu/LConover (Mason Wallace) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-03-18 · JMu (Park Road) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patti Tobin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
43.5%
20W–26L · 46.8% of games
3.5
18.8%
3W–13L · 30.6% of games
5.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 55% of games
6.5
43.8%
7W–9L · 49.7% of games
3.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 25.8% of games
6.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 50.5% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 26% of the time
#2 Doubles
26%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
27 matches
#1 Singles
8%
9 matches
#3 Singles
6%
7 matches
#2 Singles
6%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe