← Search

Jennifer Stephens

Auburn, AL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
46 matches · 5W–41L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Stephens to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history46 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Stephens · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Karen Kendall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-03 · Olsen · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Grace Childress
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-26 · Stephens · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Charlotte Cheatham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-20 · Olsen · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Shakela Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kelley Burke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-16 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Julie Cullins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-04 · Burke · #4 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jennifer Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-21 · Burke · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Alison Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-19 · Burke · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Louis Buckley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-12 · Burke · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Louis Buckley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-07 · Burke · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kelley Burke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-05-04 · Fuller-CC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brenda Kosobucki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 36.4% of games
3.0
15%
3W–17L · 33.5% of games
5.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 20.6% of games
3.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 27.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova