← Search

Tracy Brading

Charlotte, NC
4.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
225 matches · 166W–59L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Tracy Brading to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history225 matches
L
2026-09-14 · MMiller (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mary Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-09-11 · AConger/EFarnham (OPRC) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Esther Farnham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-25 · MCTA55/Claxton/RHTC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sharon Wooten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-23 · MMiller (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Taylor Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-21 · MCTA55/Claxton/RHTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dominique Oldre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-21 · AConger/EFarnham (OPRC) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Enid Randall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-18 · MCTA55/Claxton/RHTC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sharon Wooten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-18 · NNeel (Charlotte Tennis) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nadine Neel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-08-14 · AConger/EFarnham (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lindsey Kasten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-10 · MMiller (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mary Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-07 · AConger/EFarnham (OPRC) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Katharine Cheek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-04 · MCTA55/Claxton/RHTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sharon Wooten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
100%
4W–0L · 65.3% of games
4.0
82.8%
48W–10L · 64.8% of games
4.5
35.7%
5W–9L · 44.8% of games
7.5
70%
7W–3L · 58.3% of games
8.5
62.2%
23W–14L · 57.3% of games
9.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 42.1% of games
4.0mixed
64.7%
11W–6L · 55.7% of games
8.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 71.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
99 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
79 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
47 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert