← Search

Tina Brandalik

— year-end
17 matches · 4W–13L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Tina Brandalik to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history17 matches
W
2026-05-13 · Baywood - Moore (3.0 40s W) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paige Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
Susan Hardison / Tracy Taylor
2026-05-09 · Baywood - Moore (3.0 40s W) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paige Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-03 · Baywood - Moore (3.0 40s W) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Varnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-23 · Baywood - Moore (3.0 40s W) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Varnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-04-02 · Baywood - Moore (3.0 40s W) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paige Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-03-21 · Baywood - Moore (3.0 40s W) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Veda Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-03-19 · Baywood - Moore (3.0 40s W) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Samira Said
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-01 · Whitley · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paige Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-01 · Whitley · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paige Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-28 · Whitley · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paige Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-28 · Whitley · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Varnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L
2025-09-20 · BW-Roberson (55s 6.5W C) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Julie Warren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Teams3 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 41.3% of games
5.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 47% of the time
#3 Doubles
47%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer