← Search

Sandi Sherman

— year-end
39 matches · 19W–20L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sandi Sherman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history39 matches
L
2026-01-13 · MJCCA (Megan Weiland)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Trivers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-20 · MJCCA (Jamie Bill)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Bill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-08 · MJCCA (Megan Weiland)* · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Soderberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-11-06 · MJCCA (Jamie Bill)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Lipman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-22 · MJCCA (Michelle Trivers)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Trivers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-08 · MJCCA (Michelle Trivers)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tanya Squire
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-25 · MJCCA (Michelle Trivers)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mickie Merlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 3-6
L
2025-01-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Trivers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2024-11-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Trivers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2024-11-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Trivers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2024-07-14 · MJCCA (Fredricka Kahn)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Soderberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 6-7
W
2024-07-07 · MJCCA (Fredricka Kahn)* · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ariel Baverman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Teams5 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
56.7%
17W–13L · 52.7% of games
4.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 38.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
7 matches
#1 Singles
15%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
2 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova