← Search

Erina Rigdon

ALPHARETTA, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 37W–22L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Erina Rigdon to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
L
2026-07-12 · Edenwilde (Carson Schefstad)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cate Bloom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Mckinley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 6-3
L
2026-06-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Cowan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-11 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenny Neary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 4-6
L
2026-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryll Cruz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-05-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michele Bauserman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
Leigh Welles / Michelle Casey
2026-05-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Marshall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-01-12 · Edenwilde (Carson Schefstad)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-01-08 · Edenwilde (Kim Cowan)* · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Cowan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-6
W
2025-12-13 · Edenwilde (Carson Schefstad)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Edwards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-12-11 · Edenwilde (Kim Cowan)* · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-12-06 · Edenwilde (Carson Schefstad)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Cowan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
65.5%
36W–19L · 53.5% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
13 matches
#2 Singles
15%
9 matches
#1 Singles
14%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe