← Search

Opal Bravo

— year-end
245 matches · 79W–166L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Opal Bravo to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history245 matches
W
2026-07-16 · GTC:Causing A Racquet:Eller/Siracusa · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Seymour
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · GTC:Causing A Racquet:Eller/Siracusa · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Seymour
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-27 · GTC:Causing A Racquet:Eller/Siracusa · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Savath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-26 · GTC:Causing A Racquet:Eller/Siracusa · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-2
L
2026-05-23 · LS: Lyme Shores: Ward · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurie Zrenda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-03 · MLM:8.0 Lincer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Cowperthwaite mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-01 · MLM:8.0 Lincer · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tejas Bhatt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-12 · MLM:8.0 Lincer · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tejas Bhatt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-11 · GTC:Causing A Racquet:Eller/Siracusa · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Natong Lin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-29 · MLM:8.0 Lincer · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Cowperthwaite mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-03-29 · LS: Lyme Shores: Ward · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-5
L
2026-03-21 · GTC:Causing A Racquet:Eller/Siracusa · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Savath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
Teams33 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
33.3%
34W–68L · 45% of games
4.5
14.8%
4W–23L · 33.3% of games
8.0
39.5%
15W–23L · 48.5% of games
8.0mixed
32.9%
24W–49L · 46.2% of games
9.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 48.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
116 matches
#1 Singles
36%
89 matches
#2 Doubles
10%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
13 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams