← Search

Andrew Adkins

Little Rock, AR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
121 matches · 53W–68L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Andrew Adkins to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history121 matches
L
2026-09-08 · Massey/LR/Burns · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Castens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-09-05 · Andrew Adkins/LR/PVCC · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-02 · Worley/Weldon/LR/Reb · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kirk Grynwald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-09-01 · Andrew Adkins/LR/PVCC · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-31 · Massey/LR/Burns · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Castens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
Philip Querciagrossa
2026-08-09 · Andrew Adkins/LR/PVCC · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-06 · Koplen/LR/Reb · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jonathan Parkey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-04 · Koplen/LR/Reb · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jake Logan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-02 · Andrew Adkins/LR/PVCC · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-25 · Andrew Adkins/LR/PVCC · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-22 · Worley/Shepherd/LR/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Shepherd mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Gray mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
52.6%
20W–18L · 53.7% of games
3.5
11.1%
3W–24L · 35.4% of games
5.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 50% of games
6.5
44.4%
8W–10L · 49.9% of games
3.0mixed
73.7%
14W–5L · 59.6% of games
3.5mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 49.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
37 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
35 matches
#1 Singles
6%
7 matches
#3 Singles
4%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams