← Search

Connie Kleeves

MORGANTON, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
158 matches · 66W–92L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Connie Kleeves to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history158 matches
W
Denise Haughney / Amy Moore
2026-08-30 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carson Helsper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-01 · Place/PC/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with William Lewis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-30 · Kim/RB/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Helen Bugg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-29 · Place/PC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with William Lewis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-26 · Finger/RB/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denise Haughney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-07-25 · Place/PC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with William Lewis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-23 · Kim/RB/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christy Bolick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-07-12 · Finger/RB/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Ottofaro Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-01 · Place/PC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with William Lewis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-24 · Place/PC/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with William Lewis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-21 · Finger/RB/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Ottofaro Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-18 · Kim/RB/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Helen Bugg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 61.8% of games
4.0
40.5%
34W–50L · 47.2% of games
7.5
68.4%
13W–6L · 58.4% of games
4.0mixed
12.5%
1W–7L · 36.7% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–9L · 25% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
46 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe