Craig Berry
Frankfort, IL
161 matches · 114W–47L · seasons 2019–2027
Captains: add Craig Berry to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history161 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
N/A
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
Jason Richardson / Dave Pusinsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
Joel Hostetler / Shawn Mather
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
Jeffrey Wheatley / Chris Korzeniewski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
Bill Williams / Joel Hostetler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
Shawn Mather / Bill Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
Mark Garcia / William Irwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
Joseph Harowski / Timothy Shideler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 40M4.0 4.NTC Podwika Sun 4:30 $25
CHI E 55M7.0 4.HF Janzen Sun 3:30 $22
CHI E 55M8.0 2.NTC Podwika Sat 12 $25
NITA E 40M40b Naperville-Podwika/Esancy
CDTA E 40&OM4.0 7Naper Podwika Sun 4:30 $24
CDTA S 40&OM4.0 3.NTC Podwika Thu 7 $24
CDTA S 55&OM7.0 4.NTC Esancy Wed 7 $24
CDTA W 40&OM4.0 9.Naper Podwika Sun 4:30 $24
CDTA W 55&OM7.0 8.HF Janzen Sun 3:30 $22
CDTA W 55&OM8.0 1.RT Chopp Sun 4 $27
NIN NWI A 55&O 8.0 M: French
NITA E 40M18a Naperville-Podwika/Esancy
NITA E 40M40a Naperville-Podwika/Esancy
NITA E 80MX40a Naperville-Podwika
NITA W 40M18c Naperville-Podwika/Esancy
NITA W 80MX40c Naperville-Podwika
NITA W 80MX55a Naperville-Podwika
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
70%
35W–15L · 59.5% of games
4.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 39.1% of games
7.0
76.2%
16W–5L · 61.1% of games
8.0
76.9%
10W–3L · 56.8% of games
8.0mixed
76.4%
42W–13L · 59% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
42 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.