← Search

Lee Ann Kelly

— year-end
51 matches · 16W–35L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lee Ann Kelly to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history51 matches
L
Megan Comerford / Ginny Kerwin
2026-08-02 · #2 Doubles · with Marcia Nelson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie la Payne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeana McAllister
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6
W
Anna Liss Jacobsen / Julia Sheketoff
2026-05-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kay Lindsay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeana McAllister
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debbie Hortin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Marguerite Bailey / Anna Liss Jacobsen
2026-05-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debbie Hortin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-07-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeana McAllister
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2025-06-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Fay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-06-03 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debbie Hortin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2025-05-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeana McAllister
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-05-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debbie Hortin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Teams11 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 59.8% of games
3.5
26.2%
11W–31L · 41.8% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
15 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer