Michael Strilich
153 matches · 87W–66L · seasons 2019–2027
Captains: add Michael Strilich to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history153 matches
W
Peter Christensen / Jason Leonard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Teams38 teams · 2021–2027
4.0 CTC1 Colotla M40F
4.0 CTC2 Colotla M18F
4.0 KIW3 Camacho X18F
4.0 SRP1 Shinder X40F
4.0 CTC Colotla Chandler Tennis Center M18F
4.0 CTC Colotla Chandler Tennis Center M18S
4.0 CTC Colotla Chandler Tennis Center M40F
4.0 CTC Colotla Chandler Tennis Center M40S
4.0 KIW Camacho X18F
4.0 KIW Camacho X18S
4.0 SRP Shinder X40S
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
72.5%
50W–19L · 58.7% of games
4.5
22.9%
8W–27L · 42.9% of games
4.0mixed
61.1%
11W–7L · 56.4% of games
8.0mixed
58.1%
18W–13L · 52.7% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
35 matches
#2 Singles
5%
7 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.