← Search

Susan Stearns

— year-end
92 matches · 49W–43L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Susan Stearns to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history92 matches
L
2026-08-25 · NWO 55&Over 8.0W Vietmeier/Pacella-TWOS · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patti Savage-McNamara
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-30 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W Vietmeier/Campbell-TWOS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hana Thomson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-28 · NWO 40&Over 4.0W Loeb -TWOS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Didi Thomason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-27 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W Vietmeier/Campbell-TWOS · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-27 · NWO 55&Over 8.0W Vietmeier/Pacella-TWOS · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dana Loeb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-21 · NWO 40&Over 4.0W Loeb -TWOS · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
Lisa Evans / Jennifer Smith
2026-06-25 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W Vietmeier/Campbell-TWOS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Loeb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-23 · NWO 40&Over 4.0W Loeb -TWOS · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nikki Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-02 · NWO 40&Over 4.0W Loeb -TWOS · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Banker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-27 · NWO 40&Over 4.0W Loeb -TWOS · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-05-21 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W Vietmeier/Campbell-TWOS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Didi Thomason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-19 · NWO 40&Over 4.0W Loeb -TWOS · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
Teams17 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
61.4%
35W–22L · 56.4% of games
4.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 47.2% of games
8.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 32.1% of games
8.5
56.2%
9W–7L · 50.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 46% of the time
#1 Singles
46%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
23 matches
#2 Singles
12%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
7%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe