← Search

Chelsea Rice

Nashville, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
37 matches · 13W–24L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Chelsea Rice to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history37 matches
L
2026-08-25 · Rice/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rachel Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-28 · Steed/Rice/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Grace Gaines
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-27 · Steed/Rice/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Grace Gaines
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-29 · Steed/Rice/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kacey Passmore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-01 · Steed/Rice/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kacey Passmore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-09-10 · Steed/Rice/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anne Ammons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-08-26 · Steed/Rice/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Suzanne Spalding
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2025-08-19 · Steed/Rice/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Suzanne Spalding
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-07-26 · Carroll/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jared Kominsky mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-21 · Steed/Thompson/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lele Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
W
2025-06-24 · Steed/Thompson/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lele Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2025-06-21 · Carroll/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jared Kominsky mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
22.7%
5W–17L · 41.2% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 55.6% of games
3.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
8 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe